{BibTeX entries for the papers}

  1. Andrzej Wiśniewski, Effectiveness of question-answer systems. In A. Wiśniewski, Essays in Logical Philosophy, LiT Verlag, Berlin/ Münster/ Wien/ Zürich/ London 2013, pp. 53-62. [PDF]
  2. Andrzej Wiśniewski, Erotetic logic and explanation by specification. In A. Wiśniewski, Essays in Logical Philosophy, LiT Verlag, Berlin/ Münster/ Wien/ Zürich/ London 2013, pp. 105-117. [PDF]
  3. Paweł Łupkowski, Cooperative question-responses and question dependency. In Puncochar, V. and P. Svarny (eds.), Logica Yearbook 2012, College Publications, London 2013, pp. 79-90. [PDF]
  4. Andrzej Wiśniewski, Support and sets of situations, Journal of Logic, Language and Information 2014, 23(3), 383–396. DOI: 10.1007/s10849-013-9185-5 [PDF]
  5. Paweł Łupkowski, Compliance and pure erotetic implication. In Dancak, M. and V. Puncochar (eds.), Logica Yearbook 2013, College Publications, London 2014, pp. 105-114. [PDF]
  6. Paweł Łupkowski, Dorota Leszczyńska-Jasion, Generating cooperative question-responses by means of erotetic search scenarios. Logic and Logical Philosophy, 2014, 24(1), 61–78. DOI: 10.12775/LLP.2014.017 [PDF]
  7. Maciej Komosiński, Adam Kupś, Dorota Leszczyńska-Jasion, Mariusz Urbański, Identifying efficient abductive hypotheses using multi-criteria dominance relation, ACM Transactions on Computational Logic, 2014, 15(4). DOI: 10.1145/2629669. [LINK]
  8. Andrzej Wiśniewski, Dorota Leszczyńska-Jasion, Inferential erotetic logic meets inquisitive semantics, Synthese 2015, 192(6), 1585-1608. DOI: 10.1007/s11229-013-0355-4 [PDF]
  9. Tomasz Skura, Andrzej Wiśniewski A system for proper multiple-conclusion entailment, Logic and Logical Philosophy 2015, 24(3), 241-253, DOI: 10.12775/LLP.2015.001. [PDF]
  10. Paweł Łupkowski, Question dependency in terms of compliance and erotetic implication. Logic and Logical Philosophy, 2015, 24(3), 357–376. DOI: 10.12775/LLP.2015.002 [PDF]
  11. Mariusz Urbański, Andrzej Wiśniewski, On search for law-like statements as abductive hypotheses by socratic transformations. In Can Baskent (ed.), Perspectives on Interrogative Models of Inquiry: Developments in Inquiry and Questions, Springer 2015, pp. 111-127. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-20762-9_7. [LINK[PDF]
  12. Andrzej Wiśniewski, Semantics of questions. In S. Lappin and Ch. Fox (eds.), The Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory – second edition, Wiley-Blackwell 2015, pp. 273-313. [LINK] [PDF]
  13. Szymon Chlebowski, Dorota Leszczyńska-Jasion, Dual Erotetic Calculi and the Minimal LFI, Studia Logica, 2015, 103(6), 1245–1278. DOI: 10.1007/s11225-015-9617-0 [PDF]
  14. Andrzej Wiśniewski, Being permitted, inconsistencies, and question raising, in: J.-Y. Beziau, M. Chakraborty and S. Dutta (eds.), New Directions in Paraconsistent Logic, Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics 152, 2015, pp. 477-507. DOI: 10.1007/978-81-322-2719-9_22. [LINK[PDF]
  15. Paweł Łupkowski, Patrycja Wietrzycka, Gamification for Question Processing Research — the QuestGen Game, Homo Ludens 2015, 1(7): 161–171. [PDF]
  16. Paweł Łupkowski, Oliwia Ignaszak, Patrycja Wietrzycka, Modelowanie interrogacyjnego rozwiązywania problemów w środowisku gry QuestGen, Studia Metodologiczne 2015, 34, 239-254. [PDF]
  17. Dorota Leszczyńska-Jasion, Paweł Łupkowski. Erotetic Search Scenarios and Three-Valued Logic, Journal of Logic, Language and Information 2016, 25, 51-76. DOI: 10.1007/s10849-015-9233-4 [PDF]
  18. Andrzej Wiśniewski, An Axiomatic Account of Question Evocation: The Propositional Case, Axioms, 2016, 5(2), DOI:10.3390/axioms5020014. [PDF]
  19. Paweł Łupkowski, Jonathan Ginzburg, Query ResponsesJournal of Language Modelling, 2016, 4(2), 245–292. DOI: 10.15398/jlm.v4i2.173 [PDF]
  20. Mariusz Urbański, Katarzyna Paluszkiewicz, Joanna Urbańska, Erotetic Problem Solving: From Real Data to Formal Models. An Analysis of Solutions to Erotetic Reasoning Test Task. In: F. Paglieri, L. Bonelli and S. Felletti (eds), The Psychology of Argument. Cognitive Approaches to Argumentation and Persuasion, College Publications, London 2016, p. 31-46. [PDF]
  21. Szymon Chlebowski, Maciej Komosinski, and Adam Kups. Automated Generation of Erotetic Search Scenarios: Classification, Optimization, and Knowledge Extraction.ACM Transactions on Computational Logic, 2017, 18(2), DOI: 10.1145/3056537. [LINK]
  22. Paweł Łupkowski, Oliwia Ignaszak, Inferential Erotetic Logic in Modelling of Cooperative Problem Solving Involving  Questions in the QuestGen Game, Organon F 2017, 24 (2), 214-244. [PDF]
  23. Andrzej Wiśniewski, Generalized entailments, Logic and Logical Philosophy, 2017, 26(3), 321–356. DOI: 10.12775/LLP.2017.014. [PDF]
  24. Paweł Łupkowski, IEL-based Formal Dialogue System for TutorialsLogic and Logical Philosophy, 2017, 26(3), 287-320. DOI: 10.12775/LLP.2017.013. [PDF]
  25. Andrzej Wiśniewski, Deduction and Reduction Theorems for Inferential Erotetic Logic, Studia Logica 2017, online first, DOI: 10.1007/s11225-017-9738-8. [PDF]
  26. Szymon Chlebowski, Andrzej Gajda, Abductive Question-Answer System () for Classical Propositional Logic. In: Christiansen H., Jaudoin H., Chountas P., Andreasen T., Legind Larsen H. (eds) Flexible Query Answering Systems. FQAS 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 10333. Springer, Cham, DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-59692-1_1. [LINK]
  27. Szymon Chlebowski, Sequent Calculi for SCI, Studia Logica 2017, online first, DOI: 10.1007/s11225-017-9754-8. [PDF]
  28. Paweł Łupkowski, Mariusz Urbański, Andrzej Wiśniewski, Wojciech Błądek, Agata Juska, Anna Kostrzewa, Dominika Pankow, Katarzyna Paluszkiewicz, Oliwia Ignaszak, Joanna Urbańska, Natalia Żyluk, Andrzej Gajda, Bartosz Marciniak (2017), Erotetic Reasoning Corpus. A data set for research on natural question processingJournal of Language Modelling, Vol 5, No 3: 607-631. [PDF]
  29. Paweł Łupkowski, Ondrej Majer, Michal Peliš, Mariusz Urbański  (2018). Epistemic Erotetic Search ScenariosLogic and Logical Philosophy, 27(3), 301-328. doi: [PDF]
%d blogerów lubi to: